Lens hood is reversible. Canon EF 70-300 F4-5.6 IS II USM. Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM. The lens hood can screw onto the lens in reverse so that you can keep it on your camera at all times, ready to use. filter size. 67mm. 77mm. This measurement is important to take into account when buying filters. A major upgrade of Canon’s popular 70-200mm f/4 IS lens, the new Mark II remains relatively compact and lightweight, but packs a heavyweight punch in terms of performance. The speed and accuracy f/2 and f/2.8 are pretty close, f/2.8 and f/4 are different. All those samples are taken with the same lens. IMO, the bokeh of the 70-200 f4 IS is more consistent than the 70-200mm f2.8 IS. It all depends upon the frequency of the background pattern, how far away it is in relation to the camera and subject and what f-stop is set. Dave Bergman makes several key points in comparing the 24-105 f/4 and the 24-70 f/2.8. He gets into the added range of the 24-105, the greater depth control (bokeh) that the 24-70 has when it I've used both, the RF 70-200 f4 is remarkably better as far as image quality. Used you should be able to get one used for $1400-1500. You can get the EF 70-200 2.8 L ii for around the same price with an adapter but it's substantially larger and heavier for just a little more bokeh/lower ISO. IMO the RF 70-200 f4 is the way to go. Later, I took a few shots with 70-200 f2.8 Sigma and several with 300mm f2.8 Sigma, but mostly with 24-105L. The latter is so versatile that I'd regard it as a must. SIgma 70-200 F2.8 at f2.8. The Canon would be a little sharper than this at this focal length, but not at shorter ones, where the Sigma is amazing. T. Crop from 24-105L. Weight-wise, the 70-200mm f/4G VR is a bliss – at 850 grams, it is 50 grams lighter than the Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8G and almost twice lighter than the f/2.8 VR II. I love my 70-200mm f/2.8G, but after a couple of wedding seasons, I find myself using lighter prime lenses instead. Those that use the lens on a pro body like D4 and shoot all day Canon RF70-200 F4LとF2.8Lの外観から人物、風景の画質・ボケなどできる範囲で比較しました。ご参考ください。例によって超大作なので、時間ない方 .

canon 70 200 f4 vs f2 8